Jets' Ulbrich says Rodgers 'absolutely' remains the team's starting quarterbackBAKU, Azerbaijan (AP) — A new draft of a deal on cash to curb and adapt to climate change released Friday afternoon at the United Nations climate summit pledged $250 billion by 2035 from wealthy countries to poorer ones. The amount pleases the countries who will be paying, but not those on the receiving end. The amount is more than double the previous goal of $100 billion a year set 15 years ago, but it’s less than a quarter of the number requested by developing nations struck hardest by extreme weather. But rich nations say the number is about the limit of what they can do, say it’s realistic and a stretch for democracies back home to stomach. It struck a sour note for developing countries, which see conferences like this one as their biggest hope to pressure rich nations because they can’t attend meetings of the world’s biggest economies. “Our expectations were low, but this is a slap in the face,” said Mohamed Adow, from Power Shift Africa. “No developing country will fall for this. They have angered and offended the developing world.” Nations are still far apart on reaching a deal The proposal came down from the top: the presidency of the climate talks — called COP29 — in Baku, Azerbaijan. COP29 lead negotiator Yalchin Rafiyev, Azerbaijan’s deputy foreign minister, said the presidency hopes to push countries to go higher than $250 billion, saying “it doesn’t correspond to the our fair and ambitious goal. But we will continue to engage with the parties.” This proposal, which is friendly to the viewpoint of Saudi Arabia, is not a take-it-or-leave-it option, but likely only the first of two or even three proposals, said Climate Analytics CEO Bill Hare, a veteran negotiator. “We’re in for a long night and maybe two nights before we actually reach agreement on this,” Hare said. Just like last year’s initial proposal, which was soundly rejected, this plan is “empty” on what climate analysts call “mitigation” or efforts to reduce emissions from or completely get off coal, oil and natural gas, Hare said. Anger at ‘meagre’ figure for climate cash The frustration and disappointment at the proposed $250 billion figure was palpable on Friday afternoon. Tina Stege, Marshall Islands’ climate envoy, called the drafts “shameful.” “It is incomprehensible that ... (we) receive only sympathy and no real action from wealthy nations,” she said. “It is a disgrace that despite full awareness of the devastating climate crises afflicting developing nations and the staggering costs of climate action — amounting to trillions — developed nations have only proposed a meagre $250 billion per year,” said Harjeet Singh of the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty. That amount, which goes through the year 2035, is basically the old $100 billion year goal with 6% annual inflation, said Vaibhav Chaturvedi a climate policy analyst with New Delhi-based Council on Energy, Environment and Water. Experts put the need at $1.3 trillion for developing countries to cover damages resulting from extreme weather, help those nations adapt to a warming planet and wean themselves from fossil fuels, with more generated by each country internally. The amount in any deal reached at COP negotiations — often considered a “core” — will then be mobilized or leveraged for greater climate spending. But much of that means loans for countries drowning in debt. Singh said the proposed sum — which includes loans and lacks a commitment to grant-based finance — adds “insult to injury.” Iskander Erzini Vernoit, director of Moroccan climate think-tank Imal Initiative for Climate and Development, said “the EU and the U.S. and other developed countries cannot claim to be committed to the Paris Agreement while putting forward such amounts.” Countries reached the Paris Agreement in 2015, pledging to keep warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times. The world is now at 1.3 degrees Celsius (2.3 degrees Fahrenheit), according to the U.N. Rich countries call for realism Switzerland environment minister Albert Rösti said it was important that the climate finance number is realistic. “I think a deal with a high number that will never be realistic, that will never be paid... will be much worse than no deal,” he said. The United States’ delegation offered a similar warning. “It has been a significant lift over the past decade to meet the prior, smaller goal” of $100 billion, said a senior U.S. official. “$250 billion will require even more ambition and extraordinary reach” and will need to be supported by private finance, multilateral development banks — which are large international banks funded by taxpayer dollars — and other sources of finance, the official said. A lack of a bigger number from European nations and the U.S. means that the “deal is clearly moving toward the direction of China playing a more prominent role in helping other global south countries,” said Li Shou of the Asia Society Policy Institute. German delegation sources said it will be important to be in touch with China and other industrialized nations as negotiations press on into the evening. “We think this is at least a text we can work with. Now we have a map on the way forward instead of nowhere where we don’t know where we are going,” said German climate envoy Jennifer Morgan. Analysts said the proposed deal is the start of what could likely be more money. “This can be a good down payment that will allow for further climate action in developing countries,” said Melanie Robinson, global climate program director at the World Resources Institute. “But there is scope for this to go above $250 billion.” Rob Moore, associate director at E3G, said that whatever figure is agreed “will need to be the start and not the end” of climate cash promises. “If developed countries can go further they need to say so fast to make sure we get a deal at COP29,” he said. The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.Nonef1 esports 。

COLLEGE FB NOTESChairman of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) Samir V. Kamat emphasised the importance of embracing boldness in the face of challenges and highlighted the significance of lifelong learning. He was speaking at the 22nd convocation of National Institute of Technology (NIT-Warangal) on Saturday. Addressing graduates, he also shared insights into India’s advancements in defence technology, particularly in missile systems, and mentioned DRDO’s initiatives such as establishing 15 academic centres of excellence across the country. Reflecting on his journey, Mr. Kamat expressed gratitude to his first manager at DRDO, Malakondiah, an alumnus of NITW, for mentoring him during his early career. NITW director Bidyadhar Subudhi said the institute secured projects worth ₹54.72 crore and consulting grants of ₹4.19 crore. Over 300 reputable companies visited the campus for placements. The highest annual pay package offered last year was ₹88 lakh. “An endowment fund of ₹2.3 crores, established with contributions from alumni, was another notable achievement,” he added. As many as 1,875 students, including 147 Ph.D. scholars, were conferred their degrees at the event. Eleven students received gold medals for their academic achievements. Manjima Karmakar from electrical engineering was awarded gold medal for overall excellence. Manisha Varshney from the MCA received the topper’s gold medal among all postgraduate programmes. Arun Kumar from the Chemistry was awarded the best Ph.D. thesis gold medal. Earlier, Mr. Kamat inaugurated the Institute Health Centre. The new facility features a 10-bed emergency ward, a laboratory, physiotherapy services and a pharmacy, which will cater to the health needs of students and staff. Published - November 30, 2024 06:06 pm IST Copy link Email Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit

THE HAGUE (AP) — The world’s top war-crimes court issued arrest warrants Thursday for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his former defense minister and Hamas’ military chief, accusing them of crimes against humanity in connection with the 13-month war in Gaza. The warrants said there was reason to believe Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant have used “starvation as a method of warfare” by restricting humanitarian aid and have intentionally targeted civilians in Israel’s campaign against Hamas in Gaza — charges Israeli officials deny. The action by the International Criminal Court came as the death toll from Israel’s campaign in Gaza passed 44,000 people, according to local health authorities, who say more than half of those killed were women and children. Their count does not differentiate between civilians and combatants. Experts say hunger has become widespread across Gaza and may have reached famine levels in the north of the territory, which is under siege by Israeli troops. Israel says it has been working hard to improve entry of aid, though the trickle of supplies into Gaza remains near the lowest levels of the war. Netanyahu condemned the warrant against him, saying Israel “rejects with disgust the absurd and false actions” by the court. In a statement released by his office, he said: “There is nothing more just than the war that Israel has been waging in Gaza.” Gallant, in a statement, said the decision "sets a dangerous precedent against the right to self-defense and moral warfare and encourages murderous terrorism.” The warrant marked the first time that a sitting leader of a major Western ally has been accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity by a global court of justice. The decision turns Netanyahu and the others into internationally wanted suspects, putting them at risk of arrest when they travel abroad and potentially further isolating them . Israel and its top ally, the United States, are not members of the court. But others of Israel's allies, including some of its close European friends, are put in an awkward position. Several, including France, welcomed the court's decision and signaled they might arrest Netanyahu if he visited. The move “represents the most dramatic step yet in the court’s involvement in the conflict between Israel and Hamas," said Anthony Dworkin, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations. Israeli leaders, politicians and officials across the spectrum denounced the warrants and the ICC. The new defense minister, Israel Katz, who replaced Gallant earlier this month, said Thursday’s decision is “a moral disgrace, entirely tainted by antisemitism, and drags the international judicial system to an unprecedented low.” Human rights groups applauded the move. The warrants against both sides “break through the perception that certain individuals are beyond the reach of the law,” the associate international justice director at Human Rights Watch, Balkees Jarrah, said in a statement. The decision came six months after ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan requested the warrants. The court issued a warrant for Mohammed Deif, head of Hamas’ armed wing, over the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks that triggered Israel’s offensive in Gaza. It said it found reasonable grounds to believe Deif was involved in murder, rape, torture and the taking of hostages amounting to war crimes and crimes against humanity. In the Hamas-led attack, militants stormed into southern Israel, killing 1,200 people — mostly civilians — and taking some 250 others hostage. Around 100 Israelis remain captive in Gaza, around a third of them believed to be dead. Khan withdrew requests for warrants for two other senior Hamas figures, Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh , who have both since been killed. Israel says it also killed Deif in an airstrike, but Hamas has never confirmed his death. The warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant were issued by a three-judge panel in a unanimous decision. The panel said there were reasonable grounds to believe that both men bear responsibility for the war crime of starvation and the crimes against humanity of murder, persecution and other inhumane acts. The judges said the lack of food, water, electricity, fuel and specific medical supplies created conditions “calculated to bring about the destruction of part of the civilian population in Gaza,” including the deaths of children due to malnutrition and dehydration. They also found that by preventing hospital supplies and medicine from getting into Gaza, doctors were forced to operate, including performing amputations, without anesthesia or with unsafe means of sedation that led to “great suffering.” Israeli diplomatic officials said the government is lobbying the international community to speak out against the warrants and is considering an appeal to the court. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity pending a formal decision on how the government will proceed. Despite the warrants, none of the suspects is likely to face judges in The Hague anytime soon. Member countries are required to detain suspects facing a warrant if they set foot on their soil, but the court has no way to enforce that. For example, Russian President Vladimir Putin, wanted on an ICC warrant for alleged war crimes in Ukraine, recently visited Mongolia, a member state in the court but also a Russian ally. He was not arrested. Still, the threat of arrest now complicates any travel abroad by Netanyahu and Gallant. EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said the warrants are binding on all 27 members countries of the European Union. France signaled it could arrest Netanyahu if he came to its territory. Foreign Ministry spokesman Christophe Lemoine called it a “complex legal issue” but said France supports the court’s actions. “Combating impunity is our priority,” he said. “Our response will align with these principles.” Hamas in a statement welcomed the warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant but made no mention of the one against Deif. Israel’s opposition leaders fiercely criticized the ICC’s move. Benny Gantz, a retired general and political rival to Netanyahu, said it showed “moral blindness” and was a “shameful stain of historic proportion that will never be forgotten.” Israel’s campaign has caused heavy destruction across Gaza and driven almost the entire population of 2.3 million people from their homes, leaving most dependent on aid to survive. Two days after Hamas’ attack on southern Israel, Gallant announced a total seal on Gaza, vowing not to let in food, fuel or other supplies. Under U.S. pressure, Israel began allowing a trickle of humanitarian aid to enter a few weeks later. Israel now says it puts no limit on the supplies permitted into Gaza, and it blames the U.N. distribution system. But Israel's official figures show the amount of aid it has let in has plunged since the beginning of October. The U.N has blamed Israeli military restrictions, along with widespread lawlessness that has led to theft of aid shipments. The case at the ICC is separate from another legal battle Israel is waging at the top U.N. court, the International Court of Justice, in which South Africa accuses Israel of genocide , an allegation Israeli leaders staunchly deny. Lawyers for Israel argued in court that the war in Gaza was a legitimate defense of its people and that it was Hamas militants who were guilty of genocide. ___ Associated Press journalists Raf Casert in Brussels, Mike Corder in The Hague and Josef Federman in Jerusalem contributed to this report. Molly Quell, The Associated PressOXFORD, Miss. (AP) — Sira Thienou scored 16 points with six rebounds, five assists and four steals and No. 18 Mississippi coasted to an 89-24 win over Alabama State on Saturday. Starr Jacobs and Christeen Iwuala both added 12 points and Kennedy Todd-Williams had 11 for the Rebels (5-2), who had a breather after losing to No. 2 UConn by 13 in the Bahamas. Kaitlyn Bryant had seven points to lead the Hornets (2-5), who shot 19% with 33 turnovers and were outrebounded 43-25. Alabama State was 1 of 8 with 11 turnovers in the first quarter, falling behind 24-4. The Hornets were 2 of 11 with seven giveaways in the second quarter when they were outscored 33-6 to trail 57-10 at the half. The Rebels shot 58% with 28 points off turnovers. They scored the first 16 points of the game and the first 24 points of the second quarter. Ole Miss had the last five points of the third quarter and the first seven of the fourth to get the lead to 82-22. The Hornets went 1 of 10 in the final 10 minutes with 10 turnovers. It was Mississippi's third win against teams from the Southwestern Athletic Conference with one more to play. The Rebels play at NC State on Thursday in the SEC/ACC Challenge. ___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here . AP women’s college basketball: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-womens-college-basketball-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/womens-college-basketball

Magic's Franz Wagner sidelined by torn oblique

NoneSecular and Hindu nationalist historians are furiously fighting over the ideology and actions of Tipu Sultan, an 19th century Indian Muslim ruler of the South Indian State of Mysore. The fight has wide political significance given the rise of aggressive Hindu nationalism in India since 2014, when the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi came to power, and the Opposition Congress party retaliated by putting up arguments in favour of secularism and Hindu-Muslim unity rather than Hindu-Muslim division. Tipu Sultan (1751-1799) is glowingly described by his admirers as the “Tiger of Mysore” because he died bravely fighting the British on the battlefield in Srirangapatnam on May 4, 1799. In fact, Tipu was the first Indian ruler to die fighting the British. The only other Indian ruler to die fighting the British was the 19th century ruler Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi in North India. She was slain on the battlefield near Gwalior in Central India in 1858 during the first Indian war of Independence. But in the eyes of British colonial and Hindu nationalist historians, Tipu was a “furious Muslim fanatic” who indulged in the forcible conversion of Hindus to Islam. Hindu nationalist historians are presently on a vigorous campaign to remove Tipu from the pantheon of Indian freedom fighters. They have already stopped the celebration of his birthday (Tipu Jayanthi) in Karnataka State where Mysore is located. Between 2016 and 2018, the secular Congress Government in Karnataka had celebrated Tipu Jayanthi with a grand procession on November 10 every year. But since the BJP saw Tipu as a ‘tyrannical, anti-Hindu ruler’, the observance of Tipu Jayanthi was stopped in 2019 after it came to power. Hindu Nationalist view In his recently-released book entitled: Tipu Sultan: The Saga of Mysore’s Interregnum (1760–1799), Banglaore-based historian Vikram Sampath said that in 1761, Tipu’s father, the “Machiavellian” Haidar Ali, overthrew his employer and benefactor, the Hindu Maha rajah of Mysore, and assumed power. “In a war-scarred life, the father and son led Mysore through four momentous battles against the British, termed the Anglo-Mysore wars. The first two, led by Haidar Ali, brought the English East India Company to its knees. Chasing the enemy to the very gates of Madras, Haidar Ali made the British sign such humiliating treaties that sent shockwaves back to London,” Sampath said. “In a diabolical war thirst, after he succeeded his father, Tipu launched lethal attacks on Malabar, Mangalore, Travancore, Coorg, and left behind a trail of death, destruction and worse, mass-conversions and the desecration of religious places of worship,” Sampath added. “While he was an astute administrator and a brave soldier, the strategic tact with opponents and the diplomatic balance that Haidar Ali had sought to maintain with the Hindu majority were both dangerously upset by Tipu’s foolhardiness on matters of faith.” “The social report card of this eighteenth-century ruler was anything but clean. And yet, one simply cannot deny his position as a renowned military warrior and one of the most powerful rulers of Southern India,” Sampath said. Mohibbul Hasan’s contrary view However, Sampth’s assessment of Tipu contrasts sharply with that of Prof. Mohibbul Hasan, who had taught history in the Calcutta University and the Jamia Millia University in Delhi. Citing original sources, Prof.Hasan shows that Tipu was in fact a secular and progressive ruler who made Mysore the most prosperous principality in 18th century India. According to him, the derision of Tipu now is actually based on “malicious propaganda” carried out by British chroniclers and historians. Those observations are now being regurgitated by Hindu nationalist historians as part of a larger campaign to demolish Marxist/ Nehruvian and secularist Indian historiography. Prof. Hasan recalls that in his 1811 publication Select Letters of Tippoo Sultan, W. Kirkpatrick, describes Tipu as an “intolerant bigot and a furious fanatic” who indulged in forcible conversions, mass circumcisions, destruction of temples and confiscation of temple lands. Kirkpatric’s views were later echoed by M. Wilks (1864), and H. H. Dodwell in his Cambridge History of India (1929). According to Prof.Hasan, if the British chroniclers painted Tipu in dark colours, it was because he had refused to pay tribute; tried to set the Nizam of Hyderabad and the Marathas against them; and sought an alliance with their European rivals, the French. Non-communal That Tipu was non-communal is evident in the fact that a number of top officials in his Government were Hindus. Purnaiya was the Mir Asaf (in charge of Revenue and Finance). Krishna Rao was his Treasurer. Shamaiya Iyengar was Minister of Police and Postal Department. Subba Rao was his chief Peshkar (Chief Secretary). Srinivas Rao and Appaji Ram were his close confidantes. His agents in the Moghul Court in Delhi were Mool Chand and Sujan Rai. The Faujdar of Coorg was Nagappayya, a Brahmin. The Asafs (revenue officers) at Coimbatore and Palghat were Brahmins. The chief of Tipu’s irregular cavalry was Hari Singh. Rama Rao and Sivaji, a Maratha, commanded his regular cavalry. Tipu sent one of his Hindu Generals, Sripat Rao, to quell the Nair rebellion in Malabar. Aided Hindu temples In 1916, the Mysore Government’s Director of Archaeology, K. Narasimhachar, discovered a bunch of letters in the Sringeri Sankara Math (monastery), which showed that Tipu had greatly helped the monastery and its head the Sringeri Sankaracharya. In 1791, the monastery was raided and pillaged by a Maratha chieftain, Raghunath Rao Patwardan, and the Sankaracharya had asked Tipu for help to restore it. Deeply grieved, Tipu wrote back saying: “People who have sinned against such a holy place are sure to suffer the consequences of their misdeeds at no distant date” and asked his officials to send cash and grain so that the idol of Goddess Sarada could be consecrated. He also donated a palanquin to the Sankaracharya and requested him to pray for the prosperity of his domain. Tipu had contributed to the Lakshmikanta Temple at Kalale in Nanjangud taluk; the Narayanaswami Temple at Melkote; the Srikantheswara Temple at Nanjangud and to the Ranganathaswami temple at Srirangapatnam all in Karnataka. The greenish Shivalinga at the Nanjandeswara temple is known as Padshalinga because it was donated by Tipu, the Padshah or ‘ruler’. According to a Sanad, Tipu “ordered” the continuation of worship at the Tirupathi Venkatachalapathi temple. Biographer Hasan wonders if Tipu would have allowed the Ranganatha, Narasimha and Gangadhareswara temples to function in the Srirangapatnam Fort if he was an Islamic bigot. Tipu was also an ardent believer in astrology and consulted astrologers daily, first thing in the morning. Tipu is widely accused of indulging in forcible conversions in Kerala and Coorg. But according to Prof. Hasan, Tipu told his French General, Cossigny, that he ordered the forcible conversion of Nairs and Coorgis because these communities had staged rebellions repeatedly. It was reported that 70,000 were converted in Coorg, but this could not be true because the total population of Coorg was not that much, Hasan said. Punganuri Ramachandra Rao, in his Memoirs of Hyder and Tippoo (1849) states that only 500 were converted in Coorg. Hasan said that Catholics in Kanara were converted forcibly, but this was because they had helped the British defeat Tipu at Mangalore. Tipu never tried to convert loyal subjects, Hasan asserts. Administrative innovations Hasan said that Tipu gave Mysore a progressive administration and added that J. Mill in his History of British India (1848), acknowledged that as a ruler, Tipu sustained an “advantageous comparison with the greatest princes of the East”. Tipu’s country was “the best cultivated and the most flourishing in India,” Mill said. Tipu rationalised the administrative system; got rid of private middlemen; encouraged local industries; sought French industrial technology and tried to send one of his sons to France for a modern education. He set up a rocket regiment in his Army. After his defeat in 1799, the British discovered 600 launchers, 700 serviceable rockets and 9,000 empty rockets at Tipu’s fort, some of which were shipped to Britain to replicate them. The Royal Artillery Museum in Woolwich in the UK houses some of them. Tipu sought military aid from Afghanistan and Iran to fight the British in South India. He was also the first Indian ruler in the 18th century to promote international trade, having sent trade delegations to Afghanistan, Iran, Turkey and Myanmar.

COLLEGE FB NOTES

Running back Raheem Blackshear and cornerback Caleb Farley have each received fines from the NFL for unnecessary roughness during the Carolina Panthers' Week 13 loss to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Blackshear was flagged for unnecessary roughness on a punt return in the third quarter. It was offset by a facemask penalty committed by Buccaneers linebacker Vi Jones (who was also fined). Farley's unnecessary roughness penalty came on the Panthers' opening kickoff of overtime. Tampa Bay would go on to miss a field goal attempt on that drive, so the penalty didn't end up having any impact, nor did Blackshear's from earlier in the game. Carolina's valiant effort came up just short as it lost on a game-winning Bucs field goal towards the end of overtime For some reason, Farley's fine is a little bit bigger than Blackshear's - the former getting hit at $5,861, and the latter $5,472. The Panthers signed Farley back in October, and he has appeared in five games for them this season. Injuries and disappointing play have derailed Farley's career thus far after being a first-round pick by the Tennessee Titans in 2021. Blackshear is having a strong year as a return specialist and is currently leading that department in Pro Bowl voting. He has accumulated 144 punt return yards (nine per return) and 679 kickoff return yards (25.1 per return) this season. Blackshear entered the NFL as an undrafted free agent with the Buffalo Bills, but has spend most of his three-year career in Carolina. Blackshear, Farley and the rest of the Panthers will put Week 13 behind them as they gear up for a huge matchup against the Philadelphia Eagles. Carolina has played better as of late and will look to carry that momentum on the road against one of the elite teams of the NFL. A strong finish to the season will give Panthers fans a gleam of hope for the future. This article first appeared on A to Z Sports and was syndicated with permission.